hxnva Posted November 2, 2015 Posted November 2, 2015 I've noticed the large amount of "spin-offs" of the main mod, which looks like several different groups of people decided to take the mod and add to it themselves, here's an example: So, my suggestion is to add some sort of notification to the mod to encourage the fans to come and visit the website and build the mod together as a community. What do you think? Quote
Mike Posted November 3, 2015 Posted November 3, 2015 I don't think we mind people taking to and adding to the mod. But if they are then going to release their versionA ) they should make sure that the appropriate people are creditedB ) they should call it something else We purposely chose different version number for GTA SA to avoid people being confused between what is a VC mod, and what is a SA mod. But for example it looks like someone has released a "0.2f megamod" for GTA SA, which only serves to confuse people. What's also really frustrating is that some of these mod's use 0.2f models which were leaked out (by Mr Fusion, thanks man ) these models have been converted, without our permission and placed in SA and IV. Someone has already taken the 2015 taxi from 0.2f and converted it without permission - even though we have already stated that all 0.2f models will be released for GTA SA very soon. Quote
hxnva Posted November 3, 2015 Author Posted November 3, 2015 I don't think we mind people taking to and adding to the mod. But if they are then going to release their versionA ) they should make sure that the appropriate people are creditedB ) they should call it something else We purposely chose different version number for GTA SA to avoid people being confused between what is a VC mod, and what is a SA mod. But for example it looks like someone has released a "0.2f megamod" for GTA SA, which only serves to confuse people. What's also really frustrating is that some of these mod's use 0.2f models which were leaked out (by Mr Fusion, thanks man ) these models have been converted, without our permission and placed in SA and IV. Someone has already taken the 2015 taxi from 0.2f and converted it without permission - even though we have already stated that all 0.2f models will be released for GTA SA very soon. But if they're going to make large additions such as the train bridge shown in the video, wouldn't it be better for them to put their effort into the main thing? Quote
Mike Posted November 3, 2015 Posted November 3, 2015 Again, it's probably our models: http://www.bttfhillvalley.co.uk/forum/index.php?/topic/5754-railroad-models-found/ Quote
Arvark Posted November 3, 2015 Posted November 3, 2015 I don't think we mind people taking to and adding to the mod. But if they are then going to release their versionA ) they should make sure that the appropriate people are creditedB ) they should call it something else We purposely chose different version number for GTA SA to avoid people being confused between what is a VC mod, and what is a SA mod. But for example it looks like someone has released a "0.2f megamod" for GTA SA, which only serves to confuse people. What's also really frustrating is that some of these mod's use 0.2f models which were leaked out (by Mr Fusion, thanks man ) these models have been converted, without our permission and placed in SA and IV. Someone has already taken the 2015 taxi from 0.2f and converted it without permission - even though we have already stated that all 0.2f models will be released for GTA SA very soon. BTW a question, when has the mod leaked? Quote
Mike Posted November 3, 2015 Posted November 3, 2015 It was from November 2009, the very first build of 0.2f. You don't have to search far on youtube to see that it's out there: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CAYqXufV4V4 Quote
PozitiVBttF Posted November 4, 2015 Posted November 4, 2015 It was from November 2009, the very first build of 0.2f. You don't have to search far on youtube to see that it's out there: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CAYqXufV4V4 https://youtu.be/KaIOf-Qq4yI Quote
hxnva Posted November 4, 2015 Author Posted November 4, 2015 https://youtu.be/KaIOf-Qq4yI Is the drive-in also part of the leak? Quote
Arvark Posted November 4, 2015 Posted November 4, 2015 It was from November 2009, the very first build of 0.2f. You don't have to search far on youtube to see that it's out there: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CAYqXufV4V4 And why did he do it? Is he the same guy that's still on the forum? Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.